Category Archives: May Prelude

All is not what it seems in ‘God’s Pocket’

As critics continue to shred John Slattery’s (‘Mad Men’) directorial debut to pieces, this film critic must respectfully disagree. Although there are script issues and subplots that seemingly go nowhere, at its heart,’God’s Pocket’ is a decent feature.

Mickey Scarpato (Phillip Seymour Hoffman) lives in God’s Pocket with his wife, Jeanie (Christina Hendricks), and his stepson Leon (Caleb Landry Jones), whose behavior is a little unhinged. After a misfortune befalls him at work, they prepare to make arrangements for his funeral. Jeanie, a native of God’s Pocket and, therefore, all too familiar with its citizen’s disregard for the law, senses foul play and prods Mickey to investigate. In the midst of trying to secure funeral arrangements and look into Leon’s death, all things that could go wrong with his progress do and, thus, release a chain of unfortunate events.

As audiences would expect from the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman, his acting is superb in this film. While the situation worsens with the funeral date drawing near, Hoffman remains intense in his performance as his demeanor goes from calm to ticking bomb. It feels like a very true portrayal of an outsider as he’s not a native of this small town (a trait that the citizens of God’s pocket constantly remind him). His reactions are our reactions and, in his acting, he’s an excellent judge of our character.

Screenwriters John Slattery and Alex Metcalf write ‘God’s Pocket’ as a dark, comedy drama. Most scenes, while they do contain more than a touch of sorrow, Slattery and Metcalf sprinkle in dialogue that suggests otherwise. As a story that centers around a man who can’t find the money for a proper funeral–at least, in the eyes of his grieving wife–there are some moments in the film where one cannot help but laugh (i.e., a scene where Mickey is trying to trade in a meat truck to a dealership).

‘God’s Pocket’, with its main story, is one that’s a bit reminiscent of a Coen Brother’s film with how it makes light–through humor–of a dark situation. The subplots, however, don’t add anything to the story and are more of a distraction from the main story line. These smaller stories, although they involve our main characters are almost separate films, especially regarding Jeanie. In her grief, her connection with her husband begins to drift as he becomes increasingly distracted with ways in which to provide her son with a nice funeral. While an interesting concept–a marriage crumbling after a child’s death–it takes an interesting turn and one that involves an older, lonely journalist in Richard Shelburn (Richard Jenkins). The narrative also goes on to explain more about Shelburn’s background and his depressive state. Without the focus being on Mickey and Jeanie, opportunities to explore the state of their relationship, parental issues that might have been an instrumental part in their son’s demise, and the unwritten politics that write themselves in God’s Pocket, the film may not have been so uneven.

Still, the main story in ‘God’s Pocket’ is fairly enjoyable in all of its quirky and humorous glory. Phillip Seymour Hoffman gives a lovely performance and, as a whole, this film is a decent start to John Slattery’s career as a director.

Jim’s Rating: 6.75/10

Bryan Singer makes X-Men cool again in ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’

As sequels always suffer being under intense pressure to be better than its predecessor, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ proves three things: 1) sequels can be good, 2) ‘The Avengers’ isn’t the only superhero film that can pull of having lots of characters in one movie and 3) Director Bryan Singer’s still got it.

Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) must go back in time to stop Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence) from killing a scientist whose death would inevitably trigger a war between mutants and sentinels, genetically engineered robots designed to eliminate mutants.

The biggest conflict that audiences might predict would be the downfall for ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ proved to be a challenge and, in this task, Singer and screenwriter Simon Kinberg undoubtedly succeed. The story centers around a few characters–all of whom are given their fair share of screen time that also suits the story’s purpose. Although the initial plot suggests that this film is mainly about Wolverine and Mystique, it’s also about Magneto and Professor Xavier. Wolverine is merely a tool to explore the differences between Professor X and Magneto of the past and these same characters of the future.

In doing so, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ brings out many themes. As this is a time travel movie, familiar themes like facing one’s fear of the future and the consequences of changing one’s past are touched upon, but Kinberg also brings out themes regarding sacrificing one to save many, putting aside excuses not to use our gifts to help others, and hopelessness. These themes are translated beautifully through James McAvoy, Patrick Stewart, and Michael Fassbender.

In the part of the film that takes place in the ’70s, Magneto continues his crusade in trying to get rid of one–regardless of whether he or she is human or mutant–in order to ensure the safety of the rest of his mutant “brothers and sisters”. After not having seen him in a while due to his betrayal in “X-Men: First Class”, Xavier struggles with his own sense of loss and dealing with this pair in a way that he deems fit. While Fassbender does a fine job posing Magneto as this cold and calculative man with an astute purpose, it’s McAvoy that steals the show. He’s lost just about everything and, in this loss, he seeks comfort in some things that push him far away from the “professor” persona. His character has gone through the most transformation and McAvoy executes this fantastically in his delivery and physicality.

Of the ‘X-Men’ films that we’ve seen in the past, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ seemingly focuses less on including action and fight scenes and more about the story. While it’s been a while since we’ve seen these well-respected actors don their infamous mutant characters in theaters, their presence serves as a means to catapult the story into one told of their past and ways to change it to prevent their present hardships. Still, with including these veteran X-Men, Kinberg tries to weave in details from the past X-Men films in order to try to mesh the original film and the reboots together. Although a bold move, this decision only makes things a bit more confusing for fans of the previous versions of X-Men (Bryan Singer’s X-Men films, Brett Ratner’s ‘X-Men: The Last Stand’, and Matthew Vaughn’s ‘X-Men: First Class).

Despite this, ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’ is thoroughly satisfying, well-acted, humorous, and character-driven. It’s one of this summer’s best (with Captain America: The Winter Soldier being the very first) and certainly a recommendation. Welcome back, X-Men. You’ve been sincerely missed.

Jim’s Rating: 8/10

‘Godzilla’: Where the Monsters are more interesting than the Humans fighting them

Gareth Edwards shows us different sides to the infamous monster, but not without making us humans look dull, incapable, and unintelligent. If you’re willing to let go of all logic, however, you might enjoy this monster reboot.

‘Godzilla’ is a story about scientists and military personnel who try to prevent underground monsters—whose electromagnetic energy and huge physicality threaten human life—from destroying cities around the world.

The scientific concept concerning Godzilla and his enemy—as seen in the second trailer—is quite magnificent. What keeps these creatures animated is the same energy that gives us our technology. In the digital era, this is a very scary thought as there’s almost nothing that we use that doesn’t depend entirely on electromagnetic waves (i.e., no Netflix, no Internet, and no cell phones…scared yet?). Not only are these creatures huge and very capable of destroying whole cities, but they also take away our tools that make life a bit easier (when they’re working, of course).

Bryan Cranston, while giving us just a taste of the amount of melodrama in this film during the trailer, is the only character who has every right to be over-the-top as events that have transpired have made him a tad desperate, paranoid, and obsessed. Although the level of dramatization might just tip the scale of being hilarious, Cranston does a nice job with balancing between crazed scientist and a somewhat normal family man.

In ‘Godzilla’, most of our time, however, is spent with his son, Ford (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), his daughter-in-law, Ella (Elizabeth Olsen), Vivienne Graham (Sally Hawkins), and Dr. Ishiro Serizawa (Ken Watanabe). While each of them are fine actors—given how well they portray these characters relative to how they’re written—audiences will start to care more about the monsters rather than the humans and their individual stories. The humans remain flat characters even though there are plenty of opportunities throughout the film to explore their development amidst the catastrophe. As a result, the scenes in which our main characters display human emotion does not have any affect.

Furthermore, while it’s understood that a disaster film of this nature is designed to entertain people rather than draw intellectual insight, tightening the script, especially when involving the military might have made ‘Godzilla’ a little less ridiculous. At no time are the citizens in this world told to take measures—measures that would make sense in a place where giant beasts are crushing everything in their path. ‘Godzilla’ also makes a mockery, whether or not it is intentional, of the military as decision after decision drives them deeper into despair. In fairness, however, this may have been an attempt to make Dr. Serizawa’s quote about man’s efforts in controlling nature stick as there are several ways in which soldiers try to rid us of these creatures.

Although you’ll have to wait a while for them to start fighting, Godzilla and his enemies are the highlight of the film and the slight saving grace to the first hour and a half of boredom.

JIM’s Rating: 5.75/10

Belle: ‘Pride and Prejudice’ with a bit more attitude

belle

Director Amma Asante brings us a rebel with a cause in the form of ‘Pride and Prejudice’. Dido Elizabeth Belle (Gugu Mbatha-Raw), a girl of mixed race is raised by her uncle, a highly respected judge, Lord Mansfield (Tom Wilkinson). Attempting to break free from the house rules she’s been raised by, Dido becomes instrumental in a court case concerning the human rights of slaves.

Cinematographer Ben Smithard is part of the reason as to why ‘Belle’ is a beautiful film (no pun intended). It is indeed a high class society and, on top of the immaculate costume design (thanks to Anushia Nieradzik), the film emits the kind of sophistication that made audiences flock to films like ‘Pride and Prejudice’ and ‘The Young Victoria’. While the subject matter may not be as elegant as its setting, Smithard’s frequent use of wide shots truly makes ‘Belle’ an exquisite film.

Gugu Mbatha-Raw is perfect as Belle. Her onscreen presence is never dull and keeps us intrigued with every quick-witted remark, every concern, and every disappointment. The way that she responds in the privacy of her own room in a particular scene in which she feels very cut off from the rest of her family is compelling and though it may not be enough to merit an Oscar nod (on account of it being a bit early in the year that this film was released), it is indeed noteworthy, and thus, sets the standard for her bright future. Paired with her onscreen uncle (Wilkinson), she carries her own weight against the veteran actor and her confidence in the character she portrays (based on true events) makes the subject matter all the more relevant juxtaposed to the developing love story.

With a lot of films being more focused on the oppression of those of African descent on the poorer side, ‘Belle’ does the opposite. Asante and screenwriter Misan Sigay show that she was very well-accomplished, determined, intelligent, and in good fortune. Although she did struggle largely with others in her society not being able to look past her skin color, ‘Belle’ focuses on her character development. Her focus slowly comes off of her own hardships and onto those less fortunate. It’s not a common statement we see stressed in films, which is very refreshing especially with “12 Years a Slave’s” release and success.

The cast and crew give the film’s atmosphere a very ‘Pride and Prejudice’ feel with its main character not being able to see past her own prejudices and also being introduced to a man whose attempts in opening her eyes is misjudged by her. Despite the set design and dialogue also paying homage to Jane Austen, the true imitation lies in the main character and that of her love interest. Although seemingly a perfect match—especially in a scene where he confronts her uncle out in the street—Sam Reid, in his role as John Davinier, constantly crosses the line of melodrama. His performance, at times, is almost too passionate to the point of obnoxiousness and, at other times, not passionate enough. Reid’s struggling confidence in the role isn’t without its uses especially where the situation is a bit awkward or when the two are getting to know each other.

As previously mentioned, ‘Belle’ is a refreshing story about that of a woman of African descent in England’s high society being confronted with the hardships of those less fortunate facing even harder situations due to the color of their skin. Nevertheless, focusing a bit more on the actual court case would’ve also been interesting to witness. Lawyers debating for and against the human rights of slaves would not only work to open Dido’s eyes even further, but also to that of her uncle.

‘Belle’ is a unique and beautiful film based on a true story and a story that still has relevance today. Although some of the acting is a bit over the top, the film’s messages are subtle, but too important to ignore.

 

Jim’s Rating: 7.25/10

May Prelude: ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’

Producers: Simon Kinberg (“Jumper”, “Elysium”, “X-Men: First Class”), Hutch Parker (“The Wolverine”), Lauren Shuler Donner (“You’ve Got Mail”, “Any Given Sunday”, “Constantine”), Bryan Singer (“The Usual Suspects”, “Valkyrie”, “X-Men: First Class”)

Director: Bryan Singer (“The Usual Suspects”, “X-Men”, “X-Men 2”, “Valkyrie”)

Screenwriter(s): Simon Kinberg (“Mr. & Mrs. Smith”, “Sherlock Holmes”, “This Means War”), Jane Goldman (“Stardust”, “The Debt”, “X-Men: First Class”), Matthew Vaughn (“Stardust”, “Kick-Ass”, “The Debt”)

Cinematographer: Newton Thomas Sigel (“Drive”, “Valkyrie”, “The Brothers Grimm”, “X-Men 2”)

Composer: John Ottman (“Valkyrie”, “The Losers”, “Superman Returns”, “X-Men 2”)

Cast: James McAvoy, Patrick Stewart, Michael Fassbender, Ian McKellan, Hugh Jackman, Peter Dinklage, Evan Peters, Ellen Page, Nicholas Hoult, Halle Berry, Shawn Ashmore, Anna Paquin, Lucas Til, Daniel Cudmore, Kelsey Grammer

Clips:

Mystique intercedes a meeting with the world’s leaders.

A little insight into the abilities of Bishop, Blink, and Colossus.

Interviews:

Peter Dinklage (“Dr. Boliver Trask”) and Hugh Jackman (“Wolverine”) answer questions from co-stars (Patrick Stewart, Shawn Dinklage, Ellen Page, Nicholas Hoult), Screenwriter Simon Kinberg ,and fans.

Michael Fassbender (“Magneto”) and James McAvoy (“Professor X”) talk to JoBo.com about how their characters have evolved from the previous film, about working with the original X-Men cast, and about the fans at Comic-Con.

The cast talks about the story and the roles that their characters play in its reveal. (***SPOILERS beyond 3:05***)

Review: Bryan Singer makes X-Men cool again in ‘X-Men: Days of Future Past’

‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’: With a great budget comes an even greater responsibility

the amazing spider man 2Even with some cool visual effects, an impressive score, and a great cast, ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ suffers from some script structure issues.

Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) faces his toughest decisions yet shortly after his high school graduation while battling a fanatic-turned-villain, Electro (Jamie Foxx), and his childhood friend, Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan) as the Green Goblin.

Heroes are only as good as their villains. While Garfield continues to grow as a Spider-Man that we can fully understand and, therefore support, his antagonists don’t seem as formidable. A villain with whom we can empathize makes for a more balanced showdown when our hero and the villain inevitably fight (i.e., “Loki” in ‘Thor’ and in ‘The Avengers’ and “Bane” in ‘The Dark Knight Rises’). Conceptually, Max Dillon’s rise (or fall) to villainy as Electro may have worked, but cinematically it failed to genuinely play out. Max’s reason for being against Spider-Man is too rushed and, as a result, not strong enough to explain why he’d want to seek revenge on Spider-Man; his descent into crime doesn’t make sense logically. Additionally, Foxx, while he has proven his acting skills in other films (i.e., ‘Ray’, ‘Collateral’, ‘The Soloist’), doesn’t portray Max as an individual that audiences would necessarily pity, but someone who’s more of an annoyance.

Paul Giamatti has a minor role in this film as a villain we meet at the beginning of the film. Although ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’, due to the placement of each villain in the story, doesn’t fall into the same issues that ‘Spider-Man 3’ suffered with having too many villains, Giamatti’s character, Aleksei Sytsevich, is merely a temporary distraction and, had his character not been included in the film, screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, may have had more room to develop Electro’s character and expand on his gradual steps towards villainy as he is the main villain.

With superhero films growing in both size and in stakes with what the protagonist (or protagonists) must face, the dialogue should also equal the severity of the threat to give audiences that feeling of satisfaction when their heroes defeat the enemy (or hopelessness should the villain succeed). Having dialogue that’s very cliché takes filmgoers out of the experience; lines that they’ve heard numerous times before no longer hold any seriousness or authenticity. Our characters—both good-natured and ruthless—are given lines that not even comic book movies can get away with anymore with how much they’re overused. ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ has a great task in its hands in being the second installment in a rebooted franchise. The first forty-five minutes are a rehash of what the first film introduced at the end. Audiences are being retaken into a scenario that, again, distracts from what could have been a deeper analysis into Electro’s downfall or revealing Sytsevich’s much larger role in the Marvel Universe as it relates to Spider-Man.

‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ is not without its great moments and attributes. It features a score by Hans Zimmer that, while keeping melodies that resonate with the Spider-Man theme from ‘The Amazing Spider-Man’, is reminiscent of John William’s style with strong hints of Alan Silvestri’s score for ‘Captain America: The First Avenger’. It’s a very heroic and majestic score that makes you root for our zany, yet distracted hero. For any dubstep fans, ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ introduces this recent addition to the popular music industry. Instead of, however, taking away from the experience, it emphasizes the type of mind that Spider-Man is dealing with here in Electro and the grave danger in trying to defeat someone as erratic as his powers. At one point during a fight scene, we’re attuned to Electro’s inner thoughts via the score which makes for a cooler (if not, a bit chilling) experience.

For a comic book film, there are several dramatic scenes. Despite the poor dialogue that our cast must work with, the emotion behind their words are felt. As Peter Parker wrestles with having to keep a promise made previously with Gwen’s (Emma Stone) father, keeping his identity hidden from his Aunt Mae (Sally Field), and trying to figure out who his father really was, Garfield shows us a side of Parker that hadn’t yet been explored before. There’s a specific scene between Garfield and Field that shows Garfield’s range and Parker’s depth as a character.

Although his role as the villain comes much later in the film and is smaller relative to Electro’s role, Dane DeHaan’s approach to Harry Osborn/Green Goblin is the most memorable and the role that feels the most grounded. Having to constantly be told that there’s no helping his situation including his old friend, Parker, is a bit more believable in script logic as well as in DeHaan’s slow and careful delivery.

In ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’, there’s a lot to showcase and the screenwriters made things a bit more difficult for themselves in backtracking to an idea from the first film and not providing enough of a foundation for the villains in the film to stand on. For a summer blockbuster, it’s an entertaining film at times with how it presents itself visually and with the confidence in their characters that Garfield, Stone, and DeHaan depict naturally. Nevertheless, ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ struggles to stick to one main idea and falls short of its promise.

Jim’s Rating: 6.5/10

 

May Prelude: ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’

Producers: Avi Arad (“The Amazing Spider-Man”, “X-Men Origins: Wolverine”, “The Incredible Hulk”, “Iron Man”) , Matthew Tolmach (“The Amazing Spider-Man”)

Director: Marc Webb (“(500) Days of Summer”, “The Amazing Spider-Man”)

Screenwriter(s): Alex Kurtzman (“Star Trek”, “Star Trek Into Darkness”, Mission: Impossible III”), Roberto Orci (“Star Trek”, “Star Trek Into Darkness”, Mission: Impossible III”), Jeff Pinkner , James Vanderbilt (“Zodiac”, “The Losers”, The Amazing Spider-Man”)

Cinematographer: Daniel Mindel (“Enemy of the State”, “Spy Game”, “Star Trek”, “Star Trek Into Darkness”)

Composer: Johnny Marr, Pharrell Williams (“Despicable Me”), Hans Zimmer (“Rush”, “Inception”, “The Dark Knight”, “Gladiator”)

Cast: Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Dane DeHaan, Colm Feore, Paul Giamatti, Sally Field, Felicity Jones, B.J. Novak

Clips:

Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) and Harry Osborne both (Dane DeHaan) reflect on, in a way, losing their parents.

Peter Parker, in this amusing clip, helps pursue a criminal (a.k.a. the Rhino, portrayed by Paul Giamatti) and tries to steal some items back from him.

Interviews:

Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, and Jamie Foxx in an ‘Unscripted’ Interview answering fan questions (basically, them being silly)

Questions:

  • To Jamie: If Electro had a theme song, what would that theme song be?
  • To Andrew: If you could have Spider-Man form an alliance with any other superhero, who would you pick and why?
  • To Jamie: What is the weirdest rumor you’ve ever heard of yourself?
  • To Emma: Does your professional connection (between Emma and Andrew) help you?
  • To Emma: What radioactive insect should Gwen Stacy get bitten by to make her a perfect match for Spider-Man?
  • To Andrew: Have you ever killed anybody? If you knew for sure that you would never ever be found out, would you?

For a more serious interview…sort of:

Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Jamie Foxx, Dane DeHaan, and Director Marc Webb talk about the film.

Review: ‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’: With a Great Budget Comes An Even Greater Responsibility

May Prelude: ‘Belle’

Producer: Damian Jones (“The Iron Lady”, “The History Boys”)

Director: Amma Asante

Screenwriter(s): Misan Sagay

Cinematographer: Ben Smithard (“My Week with Marilyn”, “Alan Partridge”)

Composer: Rachel Portman (“The Duchess”, “One Day”, “The Manchurian Candidate”, “Mona Lisa Smile”)

Cast: Gugu Mbatha-Raw, Matthew Goode, Alan McKenna, Penelope Wilton, Emily Watson, Tom Wilkinson, Sara Gadon, Miranda Richardson, James Norton, Tom Felton

Clips:

Lord Mansfield (Tom Wilkinson) and his wife (Emily Watson) discuss Dido’s future and they’ll say once society finds out.

Dido’s uncle (Tom Wilkinson) and aunt (Emily Watson) must give her and her cousin some startling news.

Interviews:

Gugu Mbatha-Raw talks about her role and the story of Belle.

Director Amma Asante talks about how she came across the real story and how got ‘Belle’ off the ground.

Review: Belle: ‘Pride and Prejudice’ with a bit more attitude

May Prelude: ‘Million Dollar Arm’

Producers: Mark Ciardi (“The Rookie”, “Miracle”, “Secretariat”, “Invincible”), Gordon Gray (“The Rookie”, “Miracle”, “Secretariat”, “Invincible”), Joe Roth (“Alice in Wonderland”, “Snow White and the Huntsman”, “Oz the Great and Powerful”)

Director: Craig Gillespie (“Lars and the Real Girl”, “Fright Night”)

Screenwriter(s): Thomas McCarthy (“Up”)

Cinematographer: Gyula Pados (“The Duchess”, “Evening”, “Predators”, “Metallica Through the Never”)

Composer: A.R. Rahman (“Elizabeth: The Golden Age”, “Slumdog Millionaire”, “127 Hours”)

Cast: Jon Hamm, Lake Bell, Bill Paxton, Alan Arkin, Aasif Mandvi, Suraj Sharma, Madhur Mittal, Tzi ma

Clips:

Brenda (Lake Bell) tries to convince JB (Jon Hamm) to invest more in learning about the kids that he’s trying to bring into the big leagues.

JB (Jon Hamm) witnesses a player using a very unique way to pitch a baseball at high speeds.

Interviews:

Rinku Singh, the baseball player on whom ‘Million Dollar Arm’ is based, talks about the reality television show that led him to pitch for the Pittsburgh Pirates.

ESPN talks about the reality show in India, “The Million Dollar Arm”, more in depth and interviews Rinku Singh and Dinesh Patel about their experience in the contest, their inexperience with baseball, and how far they’ve come to learning the game and American customs.

Suraj Sharma talks about his role as Rinku Singh and about the difficulties that come with the process of selecting pitchers.

Jon Hamm discusses what interested him in the script, playing JB, his young co-stars, and shooting in India.

Review: COMING SOON!

May Prelude: ‘Godzilla’

Producers: Jon Jashni (“Pacific Rim”), Mary Parent (“Role Models”, “Pacific Rim”, “Noah”), Brian Rogers, Thomas Tull (“42”, “Pacific Rim”, “300: Rise of an Empire”)

Director: Gareth Edwards (“Monsters”)

Screenwriter(s): Max Borenstein, Dave Callaham (story)

Cinematographer: Seamus McGarvey (“Atonement”, “The Soloist”, “We Need to Talk About Kevin”, Anna Karenina”, “The Avengers”)

Composer: Alexandre Desplat (“Moonrise Kingdom”, “Argo”, “Zero Dark Thirty”, “Philomena”, “The Grand Budapest Hotel”)

Cast: Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Elizabeth Olsen, Bryan Cranston, Juliette Binoche, Sally Hawkins, Ken Watanabe, David Strathairn

Clips:

Ford Brody (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) tries to convince a master sergeant that he can be an asset to their team in order to board a train to help his family trapped in the city.

A great monster attacks the California coast and military personnel scramble to try to contain the beast.

Interviews:

Gareth Edwards explains to The Verge why monster movies matter, designing the monster, and making ‘Godzilla’ relevant.

Bryan Cranston Interview with “What Would Walter White Do?” and adding a few details to his character.

Review: ‘Godzilla’: Where the Monsters are more interesting than the Humans fighting them