Monthly Archives: December 2013

‘The Secret Life of Walter Mitty’ urges us to start living

walter mitty

Daydream. We all do it from time to time, but only so few of us can say that daydreams have actually inspired us to take risks, go on adventures, and do some serious traveling as much as they do for Walter Mitty.

 

Walter Mitty (Ben Stiller) is a negative assets manager for Life Magazine. A photojournalist, Sean O’Connell (Sean Penn)—whose photographs have featured in various articles courtesy of Mitty—has sent him one last picture to have published on the front page of the final printed issue of Life Magazine. When Mitty discovers that the picture has gone missing, he must venture out into the unknown for the source.

 

To introduce us into this ambitious film, the cinematographers blend the credits into the film in a very neat and artistic fashion. It’s a very interesting sequence that lets us know just how much of a fun, light-hearted experience is in store for us. The Life Magazine motto being shown throughout the movie is not only a reminder of the central themes off of which this film conveys, but also a confirmation of how different this film is (‘Walter Mitty’ may be one of the few films whose product placement actually serves a greater purpose than promoting the film’s sponsor). The cinematography and special effects do for the audience what the characters do as well: tell a story and present certain values to take with you well after the film has ended.

 

Ben Stiller, in one of his more serious roles is great as Mitty, an intuitive man only willing to take risks in his dreams until he’s faced with an incredible task. He’s a character, like many of us, who must make tough decisions and accomplish huge tasks, but are afraid of the end result. Mitty is a person to whom we can easily relate to and (silently) cheer for. With all of these traits, it’s not a role that one would expect to be an Oscar contender, but it is one that Stiller executes very well.

 

Like cinematography, characterization and special effects, the music is important here as well. While ‘The Secret Life of Walter Mitty’ isn’t a Cameron Crowe film—where the soundtracks move the story along much like the characters and/or plot themselves—there is a classic by David Bowie that is both mentioned throughout the film and even performed at one point that again, resonates with the very risk-taking, go-big-or-go-home themes that Stiller, as director, is really emphasizing here.

 

Amidst Mitty trying to locate the missing negative, Ted Hendricks (Adam Scott) whose task is to determine who to let go for the company’s transition into online publication, holds Mitty personally responsible and threatens his job in the vent that the negative isn’t found. While he comes off as a jerk in this role, Scott’s delivery (and perhaps the dialogue is the cause) is a little less than satisfactory. His mannerisms and expressions protrude bully, but his words aren’t as believable even when he’s dangling Mitty’s future right in front of him.

 

‘The Secret Life of Walter Mitty’ follows the standard Hollywood, story-telling formula, but it’s done in the most peculiar way. It has a lot of ambition and lots of heart. ‘Walter Mitty’ is its own unique film that’s fun, inspirational, and one that will stay with you for a long time.

 

Jim’s Rating: 8.75/10

While fun at times, ‘American Hustle’ does not live up to its hype

american hustle

The moral of this story is that everyone hustles to survive. With all of the backstabbing that takes place in the film, it’s questionable whether or not David O’Russell has conned his audiences into believing that this is an award-winning film. Irving Rosenfeld (Christian Bale) and Sydney Prosser (Amy Adams), both excellent manipulators, are sought out by an FBI agent, Richie DiMaso (Cooper) to bring down a politician (Jerry Renner) and several members of the local government.

 

The opening scene starts with a hilarious note warning the audience that it’s loosely based on a true story followed by a scene depicting Rosenfeld preparing for the day in front of all of us in his not-so-appealing glory.

 

With a talented cast overall, Jennifer Lawrence steals every scene she’s in. Lawrence, portraying the wife to Bale’s Rosenfeld, is the loose cannon in the grand scheme of things (and a little reminiscent of Melissa Leo’s character in ‘The Fighter’). She’s unafraid to voice her opinion whenever and wherever she chooses. When Lawrence is in a scene, you cannot help but pay attention—amused or bothered— to her every gesture and speech no matter how nonsensical.

 

If the flashy costumes aren’t enough to convince you that our story takes place in the ‘70s, feel free to let the cinematography and the soundtrack persuade you otherwise. Instead of a clear look like most period pieces—fictional and non-fictional—‘American Hustle’ features a grainy look paired with songs featuring Paul McCartney, The Bee Gees, and Donna Summers. Essentially, ‘American Hustle’ plunges you back in time.

 

While the film opens on a funny note to what audiences may expect to be a drama—given the trailer—at times, the film seems to almost make fun of itself (i.e., the opening scene, Adams and Cooper seen walking in slow motion through fog set to disco music, etc). If ‘American Hustle’ was, in fact, supposed to be playing at some of the events that actually took place, then the pace and overall sequence of the film would make sense. However, there are also scenes that are quite serious—some involving the mob—that would otherwise place ‘American Hustle’ in the drama/satire category.

 

To add to the confusion, there is one ultimate con which—for the most part—is played out through the entire film, but there are several cons taking place that are a bit difficult to follow. Each small con is explained a little too quickly to process. In addition, all of our characters con each other—some more than once. It’s hard to determine whether these are purposefully handled this way in order to emphasize their non-importance or if we are meant to pay attention to these small betrayals. Although these ultimately won’t matter given the film’s conclusion, it may have served audiences a more thought-provoking as well as a thoroughly entertaining movie had the dialogue and story been tighter.

 

Overall, ‘American Hustle’ is an enjoyable film. Despite the directionless script and its lack of full confidence, the acting performances are concrete. Although ‘American Hustle’ may not be an Oscar-winning movie-going experience, it consists of a lot of great moments between characters and you’re in for a cool time at the movies.

 

Jim’s Rating: 7/10

‘The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug’: A darker, yet funnier film than ‘An Unexpected Journey’

APphoto_Film Review The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug

Should you have any doubts that you won’t enjoy visiting Middle Earth once again (especially with this solid cast and amusing, adventurous story), feel free to cast those doubts into the (ridiculous) chasm from whence they came!

 
Bilbo Baggins (Martin Freeman), Gandalf (Ian McKellen), Thorin (Richard Armitage) and his band of dwarves must reclaim their land stolen from them by an intensely, domineering dragon, Smaug (Benedict Cumberbatch).

 
As this is the second installment of ‘The Hobbit’ series, it is befitting and reassuring to see Bilbo’s character a lot more confident in succeeding in their quest than in the previous film. As a result, it confirms for the rest of the gang their choice in having Bilbo join their mission and provides a nice balance for whenever the others start to doubt. Director Peter Jackson has highlighted our main characters’ evolution throughout this journey and it’s fantastic to witness in an action fantasy.

 
As with a lot of sequels generally being darker in plot, ‘The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug’ is actually funnier than its predecessor. Although a bold move to include so much humor, in this case, it works. Like Gimli in ‘The Lord of the Rings’ films, our dwarves in ‘The Hobbit’ provide hilarity in much of the circumstances surrounding them (i.e., a particularly fun escape/fight scene). Another reason as to why this works so well—other than the actors being skilled at getting the comedic timing just right—is because of the or scenes in which there is very little action—a trait often brought up in conversation when discussing this franchise. It is in these scenes that audiences get to enjoy and witness such power and passion behind our casts’ words and gestures.

 
For those unfamiliar with ‘The Hobbit’, this story brings back some familiar faces and/or mentions of characters from the beloved ‘Lord of the Rings’ series. Combined with the cinematography (unless you saw it in HFR 3D), ‘Desolation’ has more of a ‘Lord of the Rings’ feel to it, which only adds to the enjoyment.

 
Earlier this year, we got a glimpse of how domineering and intimidating Cumberbatch could be as a villain. Although it’s only his voice (and some of his mannerisms thanks to motion capture), Cumberbatch’s Smaug makes John Hamilton—his role in ‘Star Trek Into Darkness’—look like small practice in comparison. To be fair, a dragon has more intimidation than a genetically engineered rogue command officer, but without his presence in this role to make you sit very still in fear of this creature, Smaug would not be the same under someone else’s approach.

 
While ‘Desolation of Smaug’ is an enjoyable enough film to want to see repeatedly, it is not without its misses unfortunately. Arguably, films that have come before it have featured a lot of computer-generated images and with many of the feats being performed, this is understandable. However, it takes you out of the film once it’s blatantly evident that half of the action scenes (i.e., elves and dwarves fighting orcs) are simulated. Going in with this knowledge is a good way to avoid being bothered by this as much in theaters. Nevertheless, in some scenes, it seems as though special effects weren’t as up to par as one would expect given our advances in technology.

 
Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), an elf not originally included in the novel, The Hobbit, and the only female in the film has one purpose. Tauriel is pigeonholed as the love interest of 2 male characters. Her action scenes are really cool to watch (as we find out how skilled of a fighter she is), but otherwise her character is extremely close to pointless.

 
‘The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug’, although a little over 2 and a half hours, manages to keep its audience entertained for its duration. As mentioned there are many humorous scenes as well as intense scenes that are both entertaining and very well acted. If you haven’t seen ‘The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug’, you’re missing out on an incredible adventure.

 

Jim’s Rating: 8.5/10

‘Out of the Furnace’ carries memorable performances from Bale, Affleck, and Harrelson

http://www.wearemoviegeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/out-of-the-furnace-M-485_Crop-19rv1a_rgb.jpg

In awards season, there are always films that take their time to develop characterization and other story elements. This year, one of those films is ‘Out of the Furnace’ and before you dismiss it for what you can assume is a slow-paced movie, you’d be missing out on some pretty unforgettable performances from Christian Bale (with an accent forcing him to completely separate his voice from Batman’s), Woody Harrelson, and Casey Affleck.

 

Russell Baze (Bale) is a steel mill worker and older brother to Rodney Baze Jr. (Affleck) whom he tries to convince to get his life back together after serving four tours in Iraq. Rodney, however, decides to accomplish this by other means which gets him involved with the wrong people. After Rodney is reported missing and the police have proven unsuccessful in their attempts to recover Rodney, Russell—driven by his own sense of justice—goes on the search for his brother.

 

Woody Harrelson sheds any sign of being a (somewhat) positive influence in the lives of teenagers as with ‘The Hunger Games’ and ‘The Hunger Games: Catching Fire’ in his role as Harlan DeGroat, a meth-addicted kingpin. Harrelson gives 110% in his performance as a truly malicious character; he is one without mercy and who’s driven by only two things: drugs and money. However, what sets Harrelson’s DeGroat apart from others (other than his extremely unnerving and volatile manner) is the beginning scene featuring our villain at a drive-in that sets the stage for who it is that these brothers are going to inevitably encounter.

 

Russell is the very antithesis of DeGroat. Serving as Rodney’s voice of reason, Bale portrays Russell as a quiet and good-natured man struggling to see his brother improve his status. The film spends a substantial amount of time revealing his nature scene by scene. In one particular scene with love interest, Lena (Zoe Saldana), he receives news from her that shatters his hopes, but is—more or less—good news for her. Instead of breaking, as we might expect at this point, we instead bear witness to someone happy for her, which makes for an emotional scene between Saldana and Bale and another reason to render his character likable.

 

Unlike his brother, Rodney cannot hold onto his composure for very long and understandably so considering having to go back and forth between the US and Iraq witnessing unimaginable horrors in the process. In a very specific moment of unrest, Rodney mentions just that and Affleck’s performance is one that hits you square in the chest. Throughout ‘Out of the Furnace’, there are a few fight scenes involving Affleck, but none of these scenes will hit you quite as hard as this one does. Like DeGroat, Rodney is a loose cannon, but in a different way; his desperation for earning money in a way that he’s more comfortable with (regardless of endangerment to his life) shows with each line uttered and gaze struck by Affleck.

 

Concerning the structure, there are some scenes that parallel against each other that work well to reveal character growth and provide foreshadowing. A scene that involves Russell going hunting with his uncle (Sam Shepard) is an excellent example of his willingness to let things go and his subtle and honorable temperament that is challenged greatly later on in the film. However, the first half of the movie feels more like snapshots of Russell’s life and Rodney’s involvement in it rather than a well-flowing story involving all of the characters. Each cut feels like we’re being cut off from connecting to or empathizing with the characters at all. There isn’t any big opportunity for this until Rodney is minutes away from going missing; this is also, unfortunately, the only time there’s a real objective and direction for the movie.

 

As for the ending, we are given ‘The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King/Pride and Prejudice (US Ending) treatment. We are asked, for a moment, to come up with what may happen next for our main character and then it fades to black only to reveal in another scene the answer to that question before the movie finally ends. The second-to-last shot is the ideal last shot for that kind of ambiguous turn that works for a movie like this one. It’d also say a great deal about its audiences’ understanding of the characters and the themes. The final ending does nothing more for the story as well as our imagination.

 

‘Out of the Furnace’ is a film given its slow pacing will not be for everyone. Going against formula in the script doesn’t make it a strong one, yet even with its faults in writing and with the final shot, ‘Out of the Furnace’ is worth seeing for its brilliant performances by its very dedicated cast.

Jim’s Rating: 7.25/10

’12 Years a Slave’: The MOST Important Film You’ll See All Year

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1483976!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/slave11n-9-web.jpg

 

’12 Years a Slave’ takes everything that you know, or at least what you think you know, about slavery and crushes that into a million pieces. So, one of two things must happen (if not, both) after watching this incredibly dark, but extremely vital film: 1) go home and thank God that you live in today’s society and/or 2) take into consideration what rough spot any judge within the Hollywood Foreign Press or the Academy of Motion Picture Art and Sciences must be in to have to choose the Best Actor/Actress and Best Supporting Actor/Actress among this exceptional cast.

 

Solomon Northup (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a free African American man living in Saratoga, NY working as a professional violinist gets captured by slave hunters and brought into the South where he’s sold into slavery. ’12 Years a Slave’ is a story that upon hearing about it leaves room for its audience to feel a great sense of empathy for someone who having been born with his freedom be torn away from it and everyone he holds most dear. However, Steve McQueen has made ’12 Years a Slave’ into more than just a sad story to be told and quickly forgotten. He’s burned it into our brains with a fantastic retelling of one man’s story and he’s accomplished it with a brilliant group of performers.

 

Although only onscreen for approximately ten minutes, Benedict Cumberbatch is a slave owner who serves as Solomon’s last, small shred of hope before he’s turned over to Michael Fassbender’s Edwin Epps (whose unforgiving, but painstakingly brilliant performance will be mentioned later). While portraying a man willing to separate loved ones to acquire slaves for his plantation still leaves a little room for audiences, if not to like him, to respect him as much as they can with his tolerance towards learned slaves in his approach to the character.

 

Before his inevitable encounter (as shown in several trailers) with Fassbender’s character, Paul Dano makes an appearance and while his onscreen time is about as short, if not shorter than Cumberbatch’s, is an effective one, serving not only as the first one to try to break Northup’s otherwise hopeful spirit. We are introduced to him with a song that he teaches the slaves to sing while working; it’s a song meant to scare and intimidate them and with every verse, it takes all efforts not to cringe with disgust.

 

The bulk of Northup’s time as a slave (as well as in the film) is spent at Epps’s (Fassbender) plantation. In what might be his most ruthless role in his career yet, Fassbender portrays a wildly volatile slave owner who sees slaves only as property (a reoccurring theme that McQueen nails in this film). His strict leadership (i.e., meeting their “inefficiency” and negligible disobedience with severe punishment) is motivated by his misinterpretation of the Bible and he sees fit to treat them however he wants regardless of their well-being.

 

With Sarah Paulson playing his wife (and perfect match), it’s hard to tell who is the greater villain between the corrupt couple. While her gentle and poised demeanor suggests otherwise, she is just as cold, if not colder, to the slaves. At one point, she convinces her husband to punish a slave so harshly that one could argue the scene’s similarities to scenes from ‘The Passion of the Christ’. In other scenes, she plays the devil’s advocate in obliquely warning Northup of Epps’s intolerance for educated slaves and touching upon, albeit very briefly and in front of other slaves, why they [the slaves] don’t revolt against them being outnumbered.

 

Characters are what drive the story behind ’12 Years a Slave’ forward and its story wouldn’t impact audiences everywhere half as much without the proper actor to do its main character justice. Ejifor offers a stunning performance as a man whose freedom is taken away from him and, as a result, slowly deteriorates right in front of our eyes, especially while being under Epps’s authority. Throughout the film, as each simple pleasure and glimpse of hope and survival is brutally forced from him, his character development (or breakdown) is captured (along with a few prolonged shots) in his grief stricken face and in his weakening stature. Ejiofor perfectly depicts a man broken.

 

Last, but definitely not least, Lupita Nyong’o, like her fellow castmates deserves recognition for her role as Patsey. She is not only a victim to a horrific time in our country’s history, but also to another kind of slavery. Despite seemingly managing to keep her wits about her, she has a moment of weakness that Northup bears witness to (and when he is not at his lowest state quite yet only makes it harder for him to empathize with Patsey), it is in this moment that we not only feel for her as we do with Northup, but we see one of the greatest performances of a woman truly desperate that we’ve seen in years.

 

While Hans Zimmer has proven himself a very skilled composer, there’s a lack of his beautiful score. However, since music is meant to enhance specific feelings for certain scenes (i.e., like many of the long shots in this film—particularly one in which Northup may almost certainly meet his death), it’d be overkill to include.

 

If there’s anything that McQueen doesn’t completely nail in this film, it may have to do with the beginning scene. The first five minutes may have served a better thematic purpose after it’d been established that Solomon had been in captivity for some time.

As vast as the knowledge that we may have on slavery in the United States, there isn’t a better example of how low human beings were treated. ’12 Years a Slave’ is an actual account of the life of a man whose rights were ripped from him and there’s no better teacher than someone’s experience. Long after viewing this movie, the images and the incredible performances will remain in the minds of those who’ve had this movie-going experience. ’12 Years a Slave’ will stem conversation of perhaps our history, our own interpretation of freedom, and/or how we regard others. In this regard, ’12 Years a Slave’ isn’t just a film, but a game-changer. It is not only the most important film you’ll see all year, but perhaps the most important film you’ll see in your life.

 

Jim’s Rating: 10/10